Car Accident

Key Takeaways Settlement ranges vary widely: Minor sciatica cases may settle for $25,000 to $50,000, while severe cases involving surgery can exceed $500,000 California follows pure comparative negligence: You can still recover damages even if you’re partially at fault, though your compensation will be reduced proportionally Medical documentation is critical: MRI results, nerve conduction studies,

Car accident settlements in California typically take anywhere from a few months to over two years to resolve, and Feher Law helps clients navigate these delays every day. The timeline depends on factors like injury severity, disputed liability, insurance company tactics, and whether litigation becomes necessary. Understanding these delays can help you navigate the process

Yes, you can sue a drunk driver in California if their actions caused you harm. At Feher Law, we help victims pursue civil lawsuits that are completely separate from any criminal charges the driver may face. While the state prosecutes drunk drivers for breaking the law, you have the right to pursue compensation for your

Yes, you can get a pre-settlement loan on your car accident case in California. At Feher Law, we help clients understand these legal funding advances, which provide cash while your case is pending and help you cover expenses without accepting a lowball settlement. However, understanding how these loans work and whether they’re right for your

Getting rear-ended while stopped in California results in clear liability for the at-fault rear driver in nearly all cases. California Vehicle Code §21703 requires drivers to maintain safe following distance. Settlement value depends on injuries: soft tissue/whiplash typically settles for $5,000 to $50,000, herniated disc cases reach $50,000 to $300,000, and surgical cases or chronic

If someone brake-checks you in California, the brake-checking driver is typically at fault when their actions are intentional and unnecessary. California Vehicle Code §22109 prohibits unnecessary sudden stops. However, California’s pure comparative negligence rule means following drivers may share fault if they were tailgating, distracted, or speeding. Dashcam footage and witness statements are critical evidence

Fault in a California car accident is determined by examining police reports, witness statements, physical evidence (skid marks, vehicle damage, traffic camera footage), and California Vehicle Code violations. California’s pure comparative negligence rule (CCP §1714) allows fault to be split between drivers, with damages reduced by each party’s fault percentage. Insurance adjusters, accident reconstruction experts,

In California, the average broken sternum car accident settlement ranges from $3,000 to $450,000, though the amount depends on several critical factors that significantly impact your final compensation. Every sternum fracture case involves unique circumstances that affect the settlement value, making it essential to understand what influences your potential payout. The factors that determine your

In California, in 3-car accidents, the fault typically falls on the rear driver who initiates the chain reaction. However, California’s pure comparative negligence law means multiple parties can share liability based on their specific actions during the collision. Being involved in a 3-car accident can leave you feeling overwhelmed and unsure about your rights. The

If your car was hit in California and the at-fault driver’s insurance won’t pay, take these steps: (1) file a claim with your own insurance under uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, (2) file a complaint with the California Department of Insurance, (3) sue the at-fault driver personally and pursue assets, (4) hire a personal injury attorney to

California car accident settlements are calculated using three core components: (1) economic damages (medical bills, lost wages, property damage, future medical costs), (2) non-economic damages (pain and suffering, typically 1.5-5x economic damages), and (3) liability percentage under California’s pure comparative negligence rule. Final settlement value also factors insurance policy limits, available defendants, and case strength

If you hit a pedestrian who was jaywalking in California, fault is typically split under California’s pure comparative negligence rule. Drivers always have a duty to exercise reasonable care, even when pedestrians cross illegally. Most jaywalking cases find the driver 30-60% at fault and the pedestrian 40-70%. Drivers may still face civil liability and criminal